Ben-DutkaSome of you may know Jessica Nigri; she has posed as several video game characters, the latest of which is Juliet from Grasshopper's latest crazy title, Lollipop Chainsaw .
Unsurprisingly, her outfits have turned quite a few heads, and she just recently did an absurd live action ad for the upcoming game. But her skimpy outfits have finally gotten the wrong sort of attention.
According to Destructoid , Nigri was asked to leave the show floor until she changed out of her slinky pink outfit. So she changed back to her regular Juliet Starling costume but that apparently wasn't good enough, and was once again asked to change. The rumor is that PAX officials asked her to wear a sweatshirt for the remainder of the event, which of course would make it tough to promote a game where cleavage is a selling point.
It was also made plain that such skin isn't exactly a huge shock at PAX shows, so people are wondering why Nigri was targeted. Granted, that pink thing is just plain silly but was she really breaking any rules?
just have to ask…what is holding it on?
It's being held on by something tacky?
I think there is a string keeping it "closed".
ahaha, probably body tape and the string Abidan mentioned
If you look at other higher res photos, there's a skin coloured string or tie between the two points beneath her cleavage. It's hardly noticable, but it is holding the two sides together, along with what I assume is double sided body tape.
All I know is, if I were that outfit, I'd be clinging on tightly too. 😛 (Oh no he di'n't!!)
Zoom and Enhance!!!
ʘ_ʘâ•â•¼ ╾(╲
Last edited by richfiles on 4/15/2012 8:50:19 AM
I don't see anything wrong with what she was wearing, other than how it doesn't seem to relate to the cheerleader character she was supposed to be promoting. Maybe the PAX officials though she might have an accidental "wardrobe malfunction" and pop out of her outfit.
That would be my guess. I have no doubt that there's relatively little chance of her suit popping open on the floor, but if it did, I can only imagine the bad press it would get. I can't really blame a venue for not wanting to run that risk, regardless of how small.
Bad press over a couple of hooters exposed. Only in America…
Beamboom, on this issue, I am in 100% agreement with you. Isn't it funny how sensitive the US is to such things? Perhaps we should refer to breasts as WMDs in America?
Weapons of Mass Disruption…
Dimitrie, I'd bet a lot of dollars on that outfit being taped in certain key areas – it kind of has to be to cling that way, so even if that string were to pop, the outfit will remain over those sensitive spots…
Last edited by TheHighlander on 4/9/2012 10:47:55 AM
America the Puritanical.
Canadians would "embrace" such behaviour. (double meaning intended and the spelling on behaviour is intentionally Canadian)
Just sayin'.
I think the American terminology is actually:
"Weapons of Mass Distraction"
One need only reference the occasional police blotter that makes it onto late night talk shows reporting scantily clad women committing crimes, only to find no reliable male witnesses.
Mass distraction indeed…
/)-_-
Just thought, I really need to get to the gym more often.
Also, is there an Australian version of this model available locally? 😛
Speaking of gym, I wonder if these are the kind of babes that Ben swim in in his everyday life? The jet-set life of a games reviewer?
No offense, she's not that attractive even with all that bare skin she's showing.
Last edited by AcHiLLiA on 4/8/2012 11:51:43 PM
I love statements like that. As if we see ten chicks like that every day in Wal-Mart. 😉
I don't think we are looking at the same photo. 😉
Sounds like Ben is hitting the wrong Walmarts…
No, just the ones on earth.
I live in Florida…. Publix is where the hot chicks go.
And yes in Florida there are 10 out of every 20 chicks who look like that.
50% of Floridian women don't look like that, i don't care what market you go to, lol.
It just seems like it's 50% after you visit pretty much anywhere else ^_^
Yeah…. WalMart is not the place to pick up, poops…..
LOL! The other 50% of women in Florida are your grandmothers!
Last edited by richfiles on 4/15/2012 8:59:13 AM
What no mention of the other guy that might have gotten a permanent ban?
not really surprising i mean isent that thing open to all ages?
i can see the kids walking in then there mothers being horrified and spending 5 hours lecturing the organizers on why there going to hell.
better to be safe then sorry i guess………..
No suprise America has always treated anything sexual as bad, it is kinda sad that this kind of mentality still exists today. She is told to leave the floor when most of her body is covered, but yet you can have a guy or girl who is wearing nothing but a skimpy Gstring with their body covered in paint, and that is fine. These kinds of situations just never make sense to me.
i see nothing wrong with it if you have a body like that why not flaunt it, it's not that tacky i've seen worse from singers on the red carpet for the grammy's
… But are they real? They look real to me, they are just perfect, but that must mean they are not real, right?
Not that it matters much, but if those are real, well that puts her in a league of her own.
Last edited by Beamboom on 4/9/2012 7:41:16 AM
Little chance of those being real.
IMHO – and experience, those are not real, the shape is wrong for real. They lack the tear drop shape of the real. Pretty though they are, they do not look real to me.
Now this is what I have a problem with…. who cares if they're real.
1. its not like most of us have a chance with her.
2. as long as they are covered up they look fine to me.
3. guys like to look at boobs…. real or imaginary.
Last edited by wackazoa on 4/9/2012 12:36:30 PM
You have a problem discussing boobs?
::confused::
They don't look real to me, on how the upper part of the chest looks like and how round her breasts are, but any event she's pretty but not my type. To answer wackazoa's 3rd choice: I'm more of a nice hips, nice butt on the young ladies. I really don't understand about these girls getting breast implants, I guess it has to do with the symmetrical look and what not, when it comes to bodybuilding that's what everybody wants to aim for.
Last edited by AcHiLLiA on 4/9/2012 1:22:42 PM
Not a problem discussing boobs, just dont understand the real/not real point and why it matters ? As long as they are not nekkid real and not real look the same to me. Now fake boobs nekkid look appalling but, shoot Im not going after a chick for her boobs. So I could care less if they're real as long as they work. (although really that would be for kids anyway)
Not that it matters but my preferences are:
1. interested in ME
2. is a female thats interested in ME
3. is pretty to look at and is interested in ME
4. MOST IMPORTANT she has a great attitude and she is interested in ME !
Otherwise she could be 4ft with A cups or 5'10 with DDD's.
Last edited by wackazoa on 4/9/2012 2:11:05 PM
LOL! Who said anything about going after anyone? Appreciating the aesthetics of something does not infer a desire to do anything beyond appreciating the aesthetics.
I mean really, it's a picture of a girl in a skimpy outfit. First of all I'm quite happily married. Secondly, who in their right mind sees such a picture and starts to consider things like whether she's interested, whether she's got a great personality, or is smart, or is interested? I mean come on, it's a picture of a girl in a skimpy costume. In my personal opinion her face let's her body down, but hey, I like pretty faces. But it's about appreciating the aesthetics, not imagining a future together.
Actually, it's not even about appreciating the aesthetics because to be honest, it's not that nice a picture. I was commenting on the question Beamboom asked. I think real or fake does matter, and in terms of pleasing the eye, natural is always better than synthetic. Which I guess beings me back to appreciating the aesthetic. LOL!
Wonder how long Ben will allow a discussion about the aesthetics of synthetic breasts vs natural ones to continue?
Last edited by TheHighlander on 4/9/2012 3:03:49 PM
No I dont get the real vs not real discussion… doesnt make sense to me.
If they are covered look the same to me. If the are nekkid, fake ones look comical.
Last edited by wackazoa on 4/9/2012 3:19:26 PM
Agreed, fake ones can look comical, clothed or otherwise.
I don't really know what's going on here, but I won't be commenting. 🙂
All this talk about are they real or fake is funny. If I able to touch them, then they are definitely real.
Amen
So, you gentlemen believe in the old saying "Never mind the quality, feel the width"?
All I can say is real breasts FTW!
Last edited by TheHighlander on 4/10/2012 10:33:58 AM
I was at PAX this past saturday, and there were def some hotties walking around. DIdn't see this girl, but it doesn't look THAT much worse than what I did see.
Max Payne 3 is awesome btw
Last edited by jimmyhandsome on 4/9/2012 9:59:32 AM
Says a lot about the game. Bayonetta all over again
I think I like lollipops
Alright, another discussion about games………..*reads rest of comments*……………*passes out*.
I think that string is pretty visible… but that's just me…
Ultimately, there isn't full breast exposure so I don't understand the issue. Of course… we're talking about a country where there are thousands of jobs where having a flappin' BEARD is considered inappropriate. I'm an American and even I'm saying, "Damn, we're prudes."
Seriously, some ppl just look for any reason to create problems. Its normal for these events to be dressed that way and it even the game char costume was rejected . . .
OH NO! We are a bunch of prudes. PFFT welcome to the 21st Century, Get some testosterone in you and look at the Spankin Hot Woman. Then drop to your knees and thank god you are right in front of her.