Replay Value:
Online Gameplay:
Overall Rating:
Number Of Players:

While playing the excellent GoldenEye 007: Reloaded , my thought process was as follows: “For an HD remake of a classic game, this is pretty damn good. …but Eurocom had best upgrade big time if they want a new, current Bond entry to be taken seriously.” Well, they didn’t upgrade; rather, they just copied what already exists in a rapidly stale-smelling genre and as a result, 007 Legends will not be taken seriously. It can be fun in brief spurts and the multiplayer saves it, but the hardcore Bond fans won’t be happy.

Visually, there’s nothing special here. It only looks marginally better than Reloaded and the environments and landscapes are just plain boring. This makes zero sense as the Bond franchise is well known for exotic locales and satisfying special effects. This isn’t even a vain attempt to capture such an iconic and memorable presentation; this is more of an insult to the flash and panache of James Bond. The detail is mediocre, the settings are drab and uninviting, the effects are ho-hum, and the entire package just sits there. Dull, bland, ultimately unfortunate.

On the audio side, at least we get some of that classic music we all know so well. You can’t really screw that up and thankfully, the soundtrack does do its part to make Legends feel a little more immersive, a little more invigorating on all fronts. But sadly, they didn’t manage to get Daniel Craig’s voice for this game and his sound-alike is just no good. Other actors are a lot like the graphics; i.e., bland and almost the opposite of engaging. Some of the sound effects can be very much in your face and as such, quite effective, but that can’t make up for the clear lacking in other areas.

The campaign starts out promisingly enough. I wasn’t sure how they were going to tell a cohesive story by touching on half a dozen different movies, but it wasn’t a bad idea: At the start of the game, 007 is battling a dude on the roof of a moving train. A mysterious sniper nails him and he falls into the river below and as he’s sinking, he starts seeing flashbacks of his past adventures. So back we go to check out various parts of Goldfinger, Moonraker, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, License to Kill, and Die Another Day. The Skyfall mission is coming soon, by the way.

But instead of Connery and Moore in their correct roles, Daniel Craig has to assume those parts because…well, because obviously, they couldn’t get all the voices and likenesses they needed. It’s definitely a little weird to have Craig play all those Bond roles but it would’ve worked better had the chosen film sections been more involving. For whatever reason, the developers didn’t exactly pick the best parts of those movies (at least, not in my eyes), and it’s all thrown together in a half-ass, slipshod manner that doesn’t really tell us anything.  It's just all over the place.

I guess they just assume Bond fans already know the plots of the films in question and I suppose that’s fair. But at the same time, those Bond followers might be downright appalled at how the legendary spy is portrayed in this game. The original, the classic James Bond wasn’t about running through a bunch of baddies with machine guns blazing. Unfortunately, that’s pretty much all you do in every mission; you pause to do some minor spy work, like snapping photos and doing some other snooping around, but it’s mostly just, “shoot everything that moves and get the main villain.”

Essentially, this is Call of Duty only without the requisite technical prowess. You do have the option to approach things quietly and stealthily, and that would’ve been an excellent option if this aspect of the gameplay wasn’t so outdated. Bond should have the coolest gadgets, he should have all the shadow skills, and he should be able to cover his tracks. I want borderline Splinter Cell capability here. Instead, I get tons of guards who continually spot me, no way of hiding bodies, and a ho-hum “sneak up behind and knock ‘em out mechanic.” All this makes the mandatory stealth sections of the game waaaay too tedious.

GoldenEye 007: Reloaded was great fun for both single-player and multiplayer, but the only way you get your money’s worth out of Legends is if you really stick with the multiplayer. And even then, you better be willing to forgive a few shortcomings. At least we get the four-player split-screen option, which isn’t seen often enough these days (and I kinda miss it), and the general competition is entertaining. The Mi6 missions have returned and these can spice up the single-player but ultimately, you should still have a friend or two willing to sit next to you on the couch. Split-screen still rules.

The developers attempt to toss in a few different things here and there, like the occasional car chase or hacking mini-game, but that’s about it. The control is smooth and responsive and the AI isn’t too horribly stupid, but how many times can I rush forward, guns blazing, wondering— “…this is James Bond? Really?” I know we’re mired in a period of history where the average attention span is almost nonexistent and everything has to be constantly moving in order to be popular, but you shouldn’t do this to legends. If you’ve read the books, you know full well that author Ian Fleming never intended Bond to be anything like this.

007 Legends has its moments but they’re too often lost beneath a continual onslaught of repetitive, often tedious, and definitely mindless action. The worst part is that this isn’t faithful to the revered franchise; it’s faith less . The multiplayer might keep you coming back for more, and there’s no doubt that some of the missions are super fun to play. That’s about the best that can be said for this one, though, and it’s disappointing. Still, I have to say, I almost expected it…Eurocom can do the HD remake but they’ve never exhibited the requisite capability to produce an up-to-date adventure. This feels old and isn’t an appropriate homage, and that’s that.

The Good: Some of the missions are shoot-‘em-up fun. Control is tight and fluid. Multiplayer, especially split-screen, is great.

The Bad: Dated technical elements. Mediocre voice performances. Overall bland and uninspired presentation. AI isn’t too bright. Story is pretty worthless. Repetitive, outdated gameplay. Unfaithful to the James Bond name.

The Ugly: “Mr. Fleming’s rolling over in his grave right about now.”

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
9 years ago

I was looking forward to this game ever since I first saw the preview months ago, but now having seen/read the reviews out, I am afraid I am going to have to skip it.
I just want a good Bond game that plays similar to the old Metal Gear and Splinter Cell games, with the flavour of playing as 007 of course.
Next up is AC3 and Hitman. Crossing my fingers these two will be good.

9 years ago

It never looked interesting to me at all. The goldeneye remake was horrible and I kept hoping it would have improved on goldeneye and sadly it didn't. Although, funnily enough, I was a big fan of blood stone. It reminded me a bit of uncharted and splinter cell splashed together. Even the same mechanics from splinter cell with the mark and kill. It was a satisfying game to me :).

Heartless Angel
Heartless Angel
9 years ago


9 years ago

knew this was going to be a epic fail ever since it was announced!
sigh, just for once id like to be wrong.
just once!
so disappointing too because the last few bond games have actually been really good!
bloodstone was such a underrated game, and QoS while not as good it was still a solid game.
in fact 007 has been the standing example of not all movie based games have to suck.
its also one of the very few spy games that had stuck to its spy roots and not gone rambo.
sigh, i guess it was only a matter of time………
ill sit in my bubble and dream one day games like mission impossible and 007 the world is not enough will once again grace the industry!
2 of the best games released on ps1, and 2 of the best games EVER released!

9 years ago

If you'd like to be wrong just once, I can refer you to many posts from earlier this week. Just let me know! It should be easy to pick one.

9 years ago

Still waiting for Blood Stone: Part 2…

9 years ago

Ben will you ever start doing video reviews?

9 years ago

I've only played through the Goldfinger mission so far. Though I'm disappointed, I feel it was better made than GoldenEye Reloaded. Then again, I have very fond memories of GoldenEye 64.

Legends is just too much like Battlefield in regards to AI. NPC baddies can only spot me and my allies couldn't hit a flaming barn with a heatseaker from 10 feet away. Aside from that it is too much about running about with guns blazing, like you said Ben.

All in all, it's not terrible, I wish we had more games like Agent Under Fire. That was one of the few bond experiences that I thought was done well.