Menu Close

Fallout 4 Graphics Backlash: Don’t Bother With Snap Judgments

Every time we turn around, we hear about more gamers who are ticked off that a video game trailer wasn't to their liking.

What can be even more incendiary is if a game doesn't live up to promotional trailers, and we've seen plenty of evidence of that in recent years ( Alien: Isolation , Watch Dogs , The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt ).

But for these very reasons, we shouldn't be passing judgment on games based on early trailers. Gamers are saying some not-very-nice things about that debut video for Fallout 4 and I can't understand why. It's like nobody learns anything or has any memory retention whatsoever. We really haven't learned by now that we should take early demo trailers with a grain of salt? Really? What's it take?

Look, think logically. Is there any chance Fallout 4 is going to look like crap when it comes out? Honestly, is there? And don't forget that given the setting – which is understandably bland and stark – is pretty harsh. There's not going to be a lot of lush backdrops and rich coloring and rightly so. It wouldn't fit the presentation. Therefore, if we accept that the style fits the theme and developers at Bethesda will never in a million years launch a product that would get a 5 in the graphics department, what are we complaining about?

One minute, gamers are saying developers shouldn't be showing trailers so early. The next minute, they're freaking out that they haven't seen any media for a newly announced game. Then, when they do get that media, they act like the title in question launches tomorrow and we're watching finalized footage. It just boggles the mind.

Related Game(s): Fallout 4

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kryten1029a
Kryten1029a
9 years ago

Does anyone remember what happened with Watch_Dogs? That E3 announcement trailer was so good that it set unreasonable expectations for the game. When the launch trailer didn't come close, Ubisoft caught a lot of flak for it and they deserved to. So many people were saying, "this looks like s**t" that they kind of missed that it really didn't. It only looked bad compared to what they'd led us to believe we were getting.
I'll give Bethesda credit for not going overboard. The trailer-done in engine, I believe-actually looks pretty cool. They're at least not promising what they can't deliver. If this is what I can expect, then I'll take it and love it.


Last edited by Kryten1029a on 6/7/2015 10:34:10 PM

daus26
daus26
9 years ago

I agree that Ubisoft deserved it. It wasn't even a trailer, but gameplay. Same with witcher. It's one thing to show a beautiful, non gameplay cutscene trailer, but it's a whole other ballgame to show a gameplay trailer that makes the final look bad.

Also Ben, I think the problem here is that this is a backward situation with all those examples given here. The other problem is the trailer doesn't indicate early alpha footage or something. Not saying the gamers should complain, that it's all about the graphics, or anything but that dog was pretty horrible looking, you have to admit lol.

In all serious, it may seem immature with all these complains, but imo, for the most part, there are reasons behind it. Now personally, I wouldn't mind such graphics shown in the trailer. The character models probably the only thing that I think should definitely improve. It's like a mix of team fortress graphics with realistic 3d graphics. Kinda weird.

trumpetmon65
trumpetmon65
9 years ago

I thought it looked fine, and if "less than revolutionary" graphics is what it takes for a less buggy experience then I'm all for it

FAREEZ
FAREEZ
9 years ago

It's not about the graphic, it's all about the gameplay…

SaiyanSenpai
SaiyanSenpai
9 years ago

The environments in that Fallout 4 trailer looked great, but then those plasticy looking character models show up and the contrast to the environments seemed a little…well, weird.

And that horrid looking dog with not-so-great dog walking animation didn't help.

But trailers usually go the other way don't they? Like the famous killzone 2 and watch dogs trailer – they look better than the actual game. I hope that isn't the case here.

Shauneepeak
Shauneepeak
9 years ago

Remember the running in 3 and New Vegas? It reminded me of SUPER old movies where someone would just jog in place and they would have a screen moving behind them.

sawao_yamanaka
sawao_yamanaka
9 years ago

Killzone 2 was better than that cgi trailer. Digital foundry did a huge investigation when they compared both.

Corvo
Corvo
9 years ago

I swear people WANT to be Watch_Dogg'd.

Beamboom
Beamboom
9 years ago

When I watched the trailer all I did in my mind was to compare it with how it would have looked in Fallout 3, and from that perspective I thought it looked great!

Either way, while I am one to appreciate good graphics but with this particular franchise my focus is elsewhere. I'm sure the visuals will be plenty good enough (heck I even thought Fallout 3 and New Vegas looked pretty good and they received a lot of flak).


Last edited by Beamboom on 6/8/2015 7:59:17 AM

MRSUCCESS
MRSUCCESS
9 years ago

I'm not going to buy Fall Out 4 but I am open minded enough to say that it's going to be a great game. A game like this doesn't need over the top graphics. A game like this would thrive on side quests, customization options, replay value, map size, story options/endings etc.

Let's not forget to mention that making games and trailers is not as easy as it may seem. So much goes into it before you get it at the store and put it/download it to your console. I don't get excited about games until it's like a week or two from the release date.

WorldEndsWithMe
WorldEndsWithMe
9 years ago

The game is probably 2 years out, plus I dunno what they have in their heads but the textures are exponentially better than Fallout 3.

Beamboom
Beamboom
9 years ago

TWO more years? Wash your mouth boy.

Bio
Bio
9 years ago

Don't worry, Beam, it'll release fall 2016.

Draguss
Draguss
9 years ago

Bethesda games don't generally have what one might call top tier graphics, I don't know what people were expecting.

Cideus
Cideus
9 years ago

Personally I could care less about graphics. Gameplay and storytelling are my top 2 things to look for in a game. As long as those 2 are top notch, then it can be a great game no matter how it looks.

Rachet_JC_FTW
Rachet_JC_FTW
9 years ago

yeah well i just hope they don't pull crap move but make it way better than tha tralier wich i am sure it will be other wise everyone would be like wth happen

happy gaming

daus26
daus26
5 years ago

I agree that Ubisoft deserved it. It wasn&#39t even a trailer, but gameplay. Same with witcher. It&#39s one thing to show a beautiful, non gameplay cutscene trailer, but it&#39s a whole other ballgame to show a gameplay trailer that makes the final look bad.

Also Ben, I think the problem here is that this is a backward situation with all those examples given here. The other problem is the trailer doesn&#39t indicate early alpha footage or something. Not saying the gamers should complain, that it&#39s all about the graphics, or anything but that dog was pretty horrible looking, you have to admit lol.

In all serious, it may seem immature with all these complains, but imo, for the most part, there are reasons behind it. Now personally, I wouldn&#39t mind such graphics shown in the trailer. The character models probably the only thing that I think should definitely improve. It&#39s like a mix of team fortress graphics with realistic 3d graphics. Kinda weird.

Corvo
Corvo
5 years ago

I swear people WANT to be Watch_Dogg&#39d.

sawao_yamanaka
sawao_yamanaka
5 years ago

Killzone 2 was better than that cgi trailer. Digital foundry did a huge investigation when they compared both.

Shauneepeak
Shauneepeak
5 years ago

Remember the running in 3 and New Vegas? It reminded me of SUPER old movies where someone would just jog in place and they would have a screen moving behind them.

WorldEndsWithMe
WorldEndsWithMe
5 years ago

The game is probably 2 years out, plus I dunno what they have in their heads but the textures are exponentially better than Fallout 3.

MRSUCCESS
MRSUCCESS
5 years ago

I&#39m not going to buy Fall Out 4 but I am open minded enough to say that it&#39s going to be a great game. A game like this doesn&#39t need over the top graphics. A game like this would thrive on side quests, customization options, replay value, map size, story options/endings etc.

Let&#39s not forget to mention that making games and trailers is not as easy as it may seem. So much goes into it before you get it at the store and put it/download it to your console. I don&#39t get excited about games until it&#39s like a week or two from the release date.

Beamboom
Beamboom
5 years ago

TWO more years? Wash your mouth boy.

SaiyanSenpai
SaiyanSenpai
5 years ago

The environments in that Fallout 4 trailer looked great, but then those plasticy looking character models show up and the contrast to the environments seemed a little…well, weird.

And that horrid looking dog with not-so-great dog walking animation didn&#39t help.

But trailers usually go the other way don&#39t they? Like the famous killzone 2 and watch dogs trailer – they look better than the actual game. I hope that isn&#39t the case here.

Bio
Bio
5 years ago

Don&#39t worry, Beam, it&#39ll release fall 2016.

Draguss
Draguss
5 years ago

Bethesda games don&#39t generally have what one might call top tier graphics, I don&#39t know what people were expecting.

Beamboom
Beamboom
5 years ago

When I watched the trailer all I did in my mind was to compare it with how it would have looked in Fallout 3, and from that perspective I thought it looked great!

Either way, while I am one to appreciate good graphics but with this particular franchise my focus is elsewhere. I&#39m sure the visuals will be plenty good enough (heck I even thought Fallout 3 and New Vegas looked pretty good and they received a lot of flak).

Last edited by Beamboom on 6/8/2015 7:59:17 AM

Cideus
Cideus
5 years ago

Personally I could care less about graphics. Gameplay and storytelling are my top 2 things to look for in a game. As long as those 2 are top notch, then it can be a great game no matter how it looks.

Kryten1029a
Kryten1029a
5 years ago

Does anyone remember what happened with Watch_Dogs? That E3 announcement trailer was so good that it set unreasonable expectations for the game. When the launch trailer didn&#39t come close, Ubisoft caught a lot of flak for it and they deserved to. So many people were saying, "this looks like s**t" that they kind of missed that it really didn&#39t. It only looked bad compared to what they&#39d led us to believe we were getting.
I&#39ll give Bethesda credit for not going overboard. The trailer-done in engine, I believe-actually looks pretty cool. They&#39re at least not promising what they can&#39t deliver. If this is what I can expect, then I&#39ll take it and love it.

Last edited by Kryten1029a on 6/7/2015 10:34:10 PM

trumpetmon65
trumpetmon65
5 years ago

I thought it looked fine, and if "less than revolutionary" graphics is what it takes for a less buggy experience then I&#39m all for it

FAREEZ
FAREEZ
5 years ago

It&#39s not about the graphic, it&#39s all about the gameplay…

Rachet_JC_FTW
Rachet_JC_FTW
5 years ago

yeah well i just hope they don&#39t pull crap move but make it way better than tha tralier wich i am sure it will be other wise everyone would be like wth happen

happy gaming

32
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x