Tomb Raider Trilogy...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Tomb Raider Trilogy Review

27 Posts
2 Users
0 Likes
94 Views
Ben-Dutka
(@ben-dutka)
Posts: 630
Honorable Member
Topic starter
 
Graphics:
8.1
Gameplay:
7.8
Sound:
8.3
Control:
7.7
Replay Value:
8.0
Overall Rating:
8.0
Online Gameplay:
Not Rated
Publisher:
Square-Enix
Developer:
Crystal Dynamics
Number Of Players:
1
Genre:
Action/Adventure


In my professional opinion, Lara Croft should always be in high-definition. From here on out and until the end of time. This generation has delivered all-HD interactive experiences and for the sake of the veterans, many developers have issued overhauled remakes of their classic titles. We’ve seen plenty of fantastic collections already – all of which featuring recognizable names – and the latest is the Tomb Raider Trilogy from Crystal Dynamics and Square-Enix. Boasting Legend , Anniversary , and Underworld in 720p HD, along with the addition of Trophies and a few other goodies, this assortment is designed to appeal to all the hardcore Lara fans. But even if you’re interested in some solid action/adventures, the Trilogy should probably be on your wish list.

As is the case with any upscaling or upgrade in terms of visuals, not all graphical elements receive the beautiful reconstruction we anticipate. Some of the jaggies so common in the earlier days of PlayStation simply resist the sheer, clear glories of high-definition, and some of that is evident here. But for the most part, the atmospheres and environments become that much more appealing, as the ramped-up detail and enhanced clarity is a pleasure for the eyes. Everything is sharper, from the intimidating creatures to the expansive level design to Lara herself. You just gotta love the beautiful animations and the continual sensation that is intrinsic to all Tomb Raider titles; a feeling that we are indeed exploring uncharted waters with a brave, somewhat cocky treasure hunter. It works, you know?

I can’t be sure if the team tweaked the sound as well as the graphics, but the audio certainly seems to have a fresh coat of polish. That could just be in my head, though; it could be the afterglow of the pretty new visuals that has addled my brain, and caused me to perceive a sound upgrade that isn’t there. Nevertheless, Lara’s voice (Keeley Hawes) is great, most of the effects are prominent and in some cases, frightening, and the original musical compositions are sweeping and fitting. Personally, I’ve always thought this series was far too quiet during intervals of exploration and puzzle-solving, but then again, I’m sort of against raucous melodies and in-your-face effects interfering with my enjoyment. Balance is key, yes? And speaking of balance, it can be off at times in the audio department, but this deficiency is minor.

If you aren’t familiar with the gameplay of a Tomb Raider title, you must turn in your gamer pass tomorrow; your membership has been revoked. Even if it’s not your thing, it’s virtually impossible to have avoided at least seeing snippets of a Lara adventure in the past 15 years or so. And yet, I suppose I should elaborate for the sake of this review; it’s probably necessary for the sake of the three distinct titles, anyway. We start with Legend , which represented a bit of a departure from the norm – one some fans didn’t like, but others tolerated – and presented us with a more modern environment, along with shorter, more crowd-pleasing levels. Arguably, this one has the most diversity of any of the three games, simply because it can be considered a “reboot” in its own right. No repetition of dank, smelly subterranean caves here.

No, we’re all over the place in Legend , giving Ms. Croft the chance to test her acrobatic skills in fresh locales. Plus, we get the new magnetic grapple feature and an attempt to spice up the gunplay with cool slo-mo maneuvers. With every step, it becomes clearer and clearer that Legend was designed to inject new life into an ailing franchise and heroine, and although the fans remain split on the issue, the game was received relatively well and we have to give credit where credit’s due. The effort required to keep Lara on her feet was substantial and in truth, many of the upgrades did work out just fine, although we still had a few control and camera issues. These, unfortunately, continue to pop up throughout this Trilogy ; graphics updates won’t eliminate gameplay drawbacks such as these.

Anniversary was a simpler affair, in that it basically went in the opposite direction: rather than adopt a slick new style, it reverted to the old ways, to the ‘90s when Tomb Raider was about…well, raiding tombs and fending off prehistoric beasts. Lara’s skills remained top-notch, of course, and they didn’t sacrifice everything they implemented in Legend , but in general, Anniversary pays homage to the traditional style and format, and there’s nothing wrong with that. As for Underworld , that’s the most recent Lara quest and as it was made for next-gen consoles, it was already in high-definition. It was also the most ambitious title to date, even if it didn’t quite get everything right. Featuring a lot of variety (from Mexico to Thailand) and the deepest set of abilities yet, it’s a robust adventure.

All three games do stand up quite well, and I find that a little surprising. I’ve always, perhaps incorrectly, viewed Tomb Raider as a series that persists in gameplay and control eccentricities, which hinder the experience. Now, there are a few problems that are obvious in all three titles, but given the many different locations, the various storylines, and other significant changes (gadget upgrades, for instance), this trilogy manages to impart a huge amount of enjoyment. Remember, in regards to longevity, such collections are great; for half the price of one new game, we get three full-length titles that were – at one time – big-budget productions. Certain aspects falter over the years and there’s no getting around the control and camera instability, but it was never enough to stop me from playing.

Tomb Raider Trilogy gives the fans just about everything they’d expect: glossier depictions of three relatively popular and solid Lara Croft quests, along with new Trophies/Achievements, outfits for PlayStation Home, and behind-the-scenes stuff, like developer diaries for all three games and a couple trailers for the excellent Lara Croft and the Guardian of Light . It’s a darn good package and one the die-hard fans will undoubtedly have to own. As for those who remain a little iffy, just bear in mind that aforementioned longevity and bang for your buck, as well as the prospect of traversing much prettier environments with a much prettier Lara. That’s not an altogether unpleasant prospect, is it?

The Good: New HD graphics greatly enhance environmental and artistic appeal. Package additions are a definite plus. The three games offer distinct experiences. Huge amount of bang for your buck.

The Bad: Visual overhaul can’t stop some elements from appearing dated. Basic gameplay issues remain. Some sections drag.

The Ugly: “Oh, I remember you, Mr. In-My-Way Camera.”

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
WorldEndsWithMe
 WorldEndsWithMe
(@WorldEndsWithMe)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I'll probably pass, I don't like how the combat is lame and just a small part so that you're always wandering around solving unnatural puzzles. I'm looking forward to the reboot and hoping it takes a few pages out of Uncharted's book.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
Temjin001
 Temjin001
(@Temjin001)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I think Tomb Raider will always have a special place in my heart. The first game really got me back on PSX. I really enjoyed the experience and while the series has had it's heavy share of bumps and bruises. I want to like the TR games. I read a lot of people who claim that TR is obsolete now that Uncharted has landed, but I disagree. THey may deal with a lot of the same setting and themes. But TR skews much more puzzle solving by design and it has less action movie vibe to it. Legends deviated a bit and drew the gameplay closer to Uncharted style, but the series returned to it's roots with Underworld (sadly, very buggy)
I would've definitely signed up for this HD collection, but I already have Underworld and Legends on 360. I eventually will snag Anniversary edition for $15, or so. It's also too bad that these HD remakes don't have some of the 360 exclusive content, like "Beneath the Ashes" (so I read somewhere else) .

Anyway, good deal for PS3 users who've been wanting an HD Legends and Anniversary, plus Underworld, all on one low cost disc.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
DazeOfWar
 DazeOfWar
(@DazeOfWar)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

Still not sure if I'll bother with this HD package. I'm really waiting for the Splinter Cell package.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
Temjin001
 Temjin001
(@Temjin001)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I wish someone would confirm that they're HD remakes of the Xbox versions.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
DazeOfWar
 DazeOfWar
(@DazeOfWar)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I'm with you on that. Let's hope for the best.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
SmokeyPSD
 SmokeyPSD
(@SmokeyPSD)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I'm hoping this is released digitally. I don't see why this is bundled as a trilogy. I already have Underworld.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
BigBoss4ever
 BigBoss4ever
(@BigBoss4ever)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

i love the series, i am going to trade in my old ps2 versions of the game along with the underworld and get all in one disc.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
kraygen
 kraygen
(@kraygen)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

Awesome good review. I have always enjoyed the Tomb Raider games, but the only one in this collection that I have is legends. I happen to be one who enjoyed it, so am looking forward to getting this collection.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
Xbox_Killer
 Xbox_Killer
(@Xbox_Killer)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

Why wasn't Angel of Darkness in this collection? Definitely my favorite. There's no need for Underworld to be in this collection.

 
Posted : 24/03/2011 12:00 am
jdt1981
 jdt1981
(@jdt1981)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I agree, there's room for both games. Uncharted is more of an action oriented thrill ride where TR is more about exploration and puzzle solving at a slower pace.

I personally love both franchises, they're both great adventure games with distinct formulas. I'll be picking up this trilogy eventually and I'm also looking forward to the next TR game.

 
Posted : 25/03/2011 12:00 am
Xbox_Killer
 Xbox_Killer
(@Xbox_Killer)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

For the people that down voted me... You'd rather have Underworld which is already in HD and currently selling on Amazon for 15 dollars new, than an HD version of Angel of Darkness?

 
Posted : 25/03/2011 12:00 am
Lord carlos
 Lord carlos
(@Lord carlos)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

It only be crystal dynamics & square enix,mon!
Angel of darkness be a eidos game an thing.

 
Posted : 25/03/2011 12:00 am
Xbox_Killer
 Xbox_Killer
(@Xbox_Killer)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

All of the Tomb Raider games were published by Eidos.

 
Posted : 25/03/2011 12:00 am
Lawless SXE
 Lawless SXE
(@Lawless SXE)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I've tried a couple of the Tomb Raider games, but didn't like them for some reason. Good to see another Classics HD compilation, but this is, sadly, one that I will be passing on. Waiting for Splinter Cell, ICO and MGS.
Peace.

 
Posted : 25/03/2011 12:00 am
Page 1 / 2
Share: