Battlefield: Bad Co...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Battlefield: Bad Company 2 Review

65 Posts
2 Users
0 Likes
356 Views
Beamboom
 Beamboom
(@Beamboom)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I disagree, my experience is that you have to concentrate a lot more in multiplayer games than solo campaigns... While solo games usually give you a helping hand along the way, multiplayer is no mercy from start to finish. You either get good or get wasted.

 
Posted : 27/03/2010 12:00 am
Beamboom
 Beamboom
(@Beamboom)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

I rarely pay more than $20 on *any* game... It's just to wait a few months after release... Patience is king 😉

 
Posted : 27/03/2010 12:00 am
Kr3sn1k
 Kr3sn1k
(@Kr3sn1k)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

mw2's singleplayer was crap compared to bfbc2

 
Posted : 11/04/2010 12:00 am
BeZerkid
 BeZerkid
(@BeZerkid)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

BFBC2 is good. at least you don't get perks which turn you into a cyber robot! hardcore online i found very much better than normal play. for one reason its one shot sniper kill. campaign was great for me, sucked me in and made me laugh at the spec ops mick take aimed at MW2, yeah a good game, worth buying..

 
Posted : 19/04/2010 12:00 am
MickaeL486
 MickaeL486
(@MickaeL486)
Posts: 0
New Member
 

even though it's just a number, it's still good to see BATTLEFIELD: BAD COMPANY 2 getting a better score than CALL OF DUTY: MODERN WARFARE 2.
There's PURPOSE in BATTLEFIELD. MORE THINGS TO DO. YOU HAVE A ROLE. After playing Battlefield BC2 for the first time, I find it hard to go back to MW2. It just feels like a spastic and twitchy deathmatch. dying and killing, which becomes very dull after awhile.

BATTLEFIELD BAD COMPANY 2 FOR THE WIN!!!!


Last edited by MickaeL486 on 5/17/2010 4:25:44 AM

 
Posted : 17/05/2010 12:00 am
Page 5 / 5
Share: